The Voice to Parliament proposed constitutional amendment is the vehicle through which the Uluru Statement from the Heart is to be made law in full in Australia.

The Uluru Statement from the Heart refers to sovereignty, and declares:

‘It has never been ceded or extinguished, and co-exists with the sovereignty of the Crown.’

It is clear that proponents of the ‘Yes’ campaign are mindful of the inevitability of the Australian people becoming co-sovereigns of this great nation with Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander people.

Prime Minister Albanese will never admit that co-sovereignty is on the agenda because if he did the Australian people would never endorse such a Constitutional amendment. The Voice proposed amendment would fail dismally in the upcoming referendum. The Labor Party is too politically invested in the success of the ‘Yes’ vote to disclose anything so obviously controversial.

A discussion around co-sovereignty needs to take place so that the Australian people are fully aware of the ramifications of the ‘Yes’ vote.

The fact is that the phrase ‘co-exists with the sovereignty of the Crown’ is a tautological statement that can never have a true meaning.

Sovereignty is the supreme power or authority of a self-governing state.

The idea that sovereignty, if it ever existed before European settlement in Australia, had never been ceded or extinguished is a nonsense.

People of Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander descent make up about 3.5 per cent of the current Australian population. They have no independent government and have no independent international recognition. They are all Australian citizens. They are not an independent foreign power; they are not self-governed, and they are subject to the laws of the Australian nation. Section 5 of the Commonwealth of Australia Constitution Act states that ‘…all laws made by the Parliament of the Commonwealth under the Constitution, shall be binding on the courts, judges and people of every state…’

If they were an independent foreign power, then all members of the Senate or House of Representatives with Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander heritage would be incapable of sitting in Parliament pursuant to Section 44(i) of the Commonwealth of Australia Constitution Act 1900.

The Uluru statement calls for a Makarrata Commission. Makarrata is another word for treaty.

The question is, a treaty between who?

The Australian government cannot have a treaty with its own people.

The Australian common law system recognises contracts between certain citizens and the government in many facets of commercial life. They are never referred to as treaties. Treaties relate to agreements between independent sovereign nations.

The Uluru statement indicates that the word for the law is Tjukurrpa.

The suggestion of some kind of legal system predating European settlement may be an interesting discussion point around the dinner table, but the Australian nation adopts the English common law system and no other.

The only reason the Voice and the impossible concept of co-sovereignty is even given any publicity is because increasingly 21st Century Australia is seeing many Australian politicians, academics, and media personalities show utter contempt, disrespect, and even hatred for Australia and Australian history.

The only way Australia can retain its sovereignty is if major institutions such as government, learning institutions, and corporate Australia demonstrate with honesty an unwavering nationalistic pride and allegiance in the Australian nation and its future.

The leader of the Greens party, Adam Bandt, will not have a press conference in front of the Australian flag. Many university chancellors and local councils refuse to respect Australia Day and our current Prime Minister when addressing Parliament says we are ‘on stolen land’. An independent Senator even boasted that they are infiltrating the Senate and in protests promotes ‘Blak sovereignty’. Children at schools are being taught that Australia was founded upon some invasion and not a settlement. That the first settlers were responsible for genocide. They are told it is up to them to right the wrongs of the past. The children, the adults of the future are required to pay the penance of past wrongdoings by others.

It is in this kind of distorted and hateful environment that the seeds of division grow.

Australian sovereignty is not only attacked from within Australia, but also overseas.

The multitude of globalists organisations such as the United Nations (UN), World Health Organisation (WHO), Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC), the World Trade Organisation (WTO), the International Monetary Fund (IMF), and of course the World Economic Forum (WEF) seem to think they know what is best for all Australians and many of our elite politicians and corporate giants embrace their edicts as though they were some gift from above.

These unelected organisations that champion ideological causes such as climate change identity politics, critical race theory, and madcap changes in energy policies, make impossible demands on the Australian politic.

The Labor-Green alliance, the group of independents referred to as the Teals, and even many so-called ‘light Liberals’ ensure that the Australian people must follow these useless policies. The result which is inevitable is a reduced standard of living for all Australian people.

This is an attack on our sovereignty from outside our shores.

By ensuring that we retain our sovereignty and our democratic system of government, then axiomatically, all Australian people can remain sovereigns of their nation and their destiny.

The current federal Labour-Greens alliance has demonstrated it is not interested in protecting either Australian sovereignty or Australian democracy.

At a recent National Press Club speech, the Minister for Aboriginal Affairs Linda Burney, when discussing the proposed Voice to Parliament, said:

‘Unlike government, it (the Voice) won’t be distracted by the three-year election cycle.’

Is election day really a distraction rather than the cornerstone of the democratic system? Is that what the wider Australian citizenry believe?

There is no such thing as co-sovereignty.

The Albanese government, by its insistence on procuring a constitutionally enshrined unelected body which, through its utterings in the Uluru Statement from the Heart, talks unequivocally about Aboriginal and Torres Strait Island sovereignty is consciously threatening to eliminate Australian national sovereignty and Australian national democracy.

It is time for Australians to use the greatest weapon they have against tyranny.

The right to vote.

Vote ‘No’ to the Voice and defend Australian sovereignty and Australian democracy.